New Foundations is consistent
نویسنده
چکیده
Change Notes: 8/18/2015: imported the revision of the “relevant FM interpretation” found in the latest series, which actually describes what happens in every clan in the main construction without oversimplification. 6/24/2015: 3 am debugging wording in various places. 6/23/2015: 7:46 am MST some typos corrected external permutations seem to be needed to handle the elementarity argument. I have talked through this with Nathan’s group and I believe I know what is needed. corrected action of an injection of P (∅) into P (A), requring the range to be included in clan(P (A1)) and noting the reason. Installed definition of external permutations and proofs of their properties, and corrected the elementarity proof. 6/22/2015: 3:30 pm there is an omission of important detail in the discussion of elementarity, which I have partly made good here. 2:30 pm Some detailed edits and corrections as I read through this. I have not examined this version so carefully in a long time. It does hold up on examination, but there are minor slips here and there, and there are places where clarification of structure is needed. 9 am Corrected one place where the definition of B << A is misstated: in all occurrences, it is supposed to include 0 ∈ B (though this may be misguided or unnecessary as discussion below points out). Corrected the definition of formal element by adding a star (under set codes). Nathan Bowler’s reading group felt that images of argument lists under allowable permutations were not necessarily argument lists because of an issue with representatives. On discussion with Nathan, I think the text as it stands is correct. Some additional exposition of the confusing point might be wanted. adding language about a point noticed by Nathan and his group: In this note I use the abbreviation clan[A] for clan(P (A)) which is used in a later version. Nathan points out that we can prove in fact that P(clan[A]) = τ(A) for any clan index A. The equation to be shown is (if B << A = Bn) |P |B|−|A|+2(clan[B])| = |P(clan[A])|.
منابع مشابه
Symmetry motivates a new consistent fragment of NF and an extension of NF with semantic motivation
A sequence of theories of sets and classes is presented, indexed by a natural number parameter k. The criterion for determining which classes are sets has to do with symmetry. The theories with k ≥ 2 are shown to entail Quine’s New Foundations, which is interesting as the criteria for sethood do not involved typed set theory or syntax of formulas. The theories with k = 0, 1 are shown to be cons...
متن کاملمبانی متافیزیکی اندیشه اسلامی بنیانی برای تکوین نظریههای روانشناختی
Scientific theories have metaphysical foundations whether explicitly expressed or these foundations play important role in development of scientific theories in almost all aspects of development. Considering new metaphysical views as new foundations could lead to providing new scientific theories. In this article, Islamic views on human nature are suggested as new foundations for developing the...
متن کاملExtensional Quotients for Type Theory and the Consistency Problem for NF
Quine’s “New Foundations” (NF) was first presented in Quine [1937] and later on in Quine [1963]. Ernst Specker [1958, 1962], building upon a previous result of Ehrenfeucht and Mostowski [1956], showed that NF is consistent if and only if there is a model of the Theory of Negative (and positive) Types (TNT) with full extensionality that admits of a “shifting automorphism,” but the existence of a...
متن کاملA new foundation for the mean-variance analysis
In this paper, I re-examine how the mean–variance analysis is consistent with its traditional theoretical foundations, namely, stochastic dominance and the expected utility theory. Then I propose a simplified version of the coarse utility theory as a new foundation. I prove that, by assuming risk aversion and the normality of asset variables, the simplified model is well behaved; indifference c...
متن کاملPerformance of Nondestructive Sonic Echo Testing Method on Partially Dismantled Unknown Wood Bridge Foundations; A Case Study
Sonic Echo (SE) testing method is a well-known, versatile method to gather information pertaining to unknown bridge foundations. Many studies on the applicability and methodology improvement of SE tests to evaluate individual piles and foundations supporting the superstructure have been reported previously. However, there is a rare opportunity for obtaining the performance of SE tests without t...
متن کاملGeotechnical Interaction of Piled Raft Foundations: Two Case Studies
Application of pile-raft foundations, which are known as “compound foundations”, is a suitable alternative in the case of heavy load structures. The interaction behavior of pile raft foundations makes these systems very complex to analyze. Different methods have been proposed to determine the bearing capacity of piled raft systems and distribution of loads between the components, i.e. pile grou...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014